Nic Lewis took just days to debunk some of the fundamental assumptions of a landmark study on ocean-rise that created alarming headlines around the world when the journal, Nature, published it in October 2018. It took nearly a year from when Nature learned of the statistical errors, until they formally retracted the Resplandy et al. paper on ocean heat uptake this week. Does the prestigious scientific journal’s peer-review process hold inherent bias? Would they be better off letting amateurs critique studies before they officially publish? And what do you tell your child whose teachers may place childlike faith in the scientific community’s preconceived conclusions? Link to Nic Lewis’ Blog: https://judithcurry.com/author/niclewis/ Bill Whittle Now with Scott Ott comes from the Members who fund it, and who run their own blog on a private site. You can join them today — with a 30-day money-back guarantee — at https://BillWhittle.com/register/ . If you don’t think it’s well worth your investment, just write us for a full, rapid and cheerful refund